Jersey City $4.6 Billion Casino Resort Proposed for North Jersey

Jersey City $4.6 Billion Casino Resort Proposed for North Jersey

A casino in Jersey City could fight off competition from nyc in the Garden State casino market (Image:

Venture capitalist Paul Fireman wants to construct a $4.6 billion casino resort in Jersey City, according to reports by the latest Jersey press. State Governor Chris Christie recently declared his openness to your expansion of casino video gaming into North Jersey, also it appears Fireman, who is A ceo that is former of and now runs Fireman Capital Partners, is working hard to make it work well.

The businessman has been meeting with New Jersey politicians over the past month to discuss his proposition for the 95-story hotel and casino increasing above New York Harbor that would additionally feature a motorsports stadium and ‘the largest Ferris wheel into the world.’

Atlantic City, that has always had the monopoly on casino gaming since the first home exposed there in 1978, has lately been in serious economic straits. Despite injections of money and a plan that is five-year rejuvenate the city, spearheaded by Governor Christie in 2011, its casino market didn’t bounce back from the recession, as was indeed hoped.

Additionally, it is often hit hard by brand new competition from neighboring states such as Pennsylvania, which has superseded New Jersey as the 2nd casino market that is biggest in the usa, after Nevada. And while Atlantic City casinos like The Showboat and Revel contemplate closure, Christie has apparently been forced to concede that a tactic that is new needed.

Very good News for AC?

But definately not hurting Atlantic City, numerous analysts believe that an expansion in the north will help the ailing resort. The proposed resort in Jersey would stay right across the harbor from Manhattan, and would act being a bastion, protecting New Jersey from further competition through the new casinos prepared for upstate New York, diverting New Yorkers and vacationers away from those gambling enterprises, while gathering income that may assist develop Atlantic City.

State Senate President Stephen Sweeney agrees.

‘This conversation is likely to be had because it has to be had, but it will not be had at Atlantic City’s expense,’ he said. ‘If anyone believes that we’m maybe not focused on Atlantic City, they’re crazy. We cannot ignore that competition is going to be in nyc shortly. However if nj-new Jersey responds by opening a casino in North Jersey, it should happen in ways that may truly gain Atlantic City. At this time we tax casinos at eight-and-a-half %. Maybe we set a new tax rate for a casino in the north and a percentage of that that’s significant enough to aid Atlantic City involves Atlantic City.’

‘It Will Blow Away Macau’

While casino expansion into North Jersey would require an amendment towards the state constitution, Sweeney said recently he had been prepared to enable citizens to vote on such an amendment next year. And while information on the proposed development in Jersey City stay few and far between, it seems that Fireman has convinced some social people in high places currently.

Jersey City Mayor Steve Fulop indicated his excitement this week about a ‘world-class facility that features a casino, resort and meeting center also the largest Ferris wheel on earth all situated close to the best park in nj (Liberty State Park).’ He added that the project would ‘create 25,000 jobs’ and attract ‘over $5 billion of investment.’

‘It’s huge,’ stated state Senator Raymond Lesniak, who has met with Fireman. ‘It has the wow factor … it’s going to blow away Macau being a location place for gaming.’

Casinos Seek Conscious Uncoupling from US Dog Racing

Greyhound dog racing is now only a sideshow at many US tracks, where casino games bring within the profits that are real. The sport in addition has been the topic of intense criticism. (Image:

In the event that you shop around the united states, you’ll still see a reasonable amount of dog racing, at least in those states that haven’t made the practice illegal, following massive criticism of many for the issues surrounding the sport. But at most songs, greyhounds are now raced and then fulfill an obligation that is legal allows the owners to also stage more profitable tasks. And when the time comes when that motivation to stage dog races goes away, there may be no reason left to own them at all: something that lots of people would say is a good thing.

The signs of dog racing’s demise have already been seen by industry experts for decades. In 1990, there was nearly $1 billion bet on real time dog races in Florida, one of many hotbeds that are remaining the contests. In 2013, that number had dropped to $258 million. The decrease has been mainly related to the spread of casino gambling over the national nation, which gave gamblers and tourists more options for spending their some time cash.

Dog Racing Only a Path to Casino Revenues

Yet those exact same gambling enterprises have most likely saved greyhound racing at the same time. Many tracks are subsidized by the casinos that are same have actually taken their business away, making it profitable to keep the races going, even as interest in them has waned

The track owners actually run casinos, slot parlors, or poker rooms themselves in many cases. In these situations, it’s almost always the other business that is profitable; the races are needed as section of licenses that require ‘coupling’ the casino-style games with events.

That’s the instance in Florida, that is still home to 12 of the 21 American tracks that offer live greyhound racing. A number of other tracks do not even have their own races anymore, and keep up the racing part of the bargain only by simulcasting competitions from other tracks.

Owners, Opponents Want Decoupling

This has left many racetrack owners to push for a ‘decoupling’ motion that would end their obligation to operate dog races and just let them focus on their other gambling interests. This has triggered a uncommon alliance between track owners and animal rights groups who believe that the events are cruel and that the dogs are mistreated. These groups think that decoupling will inevitably induce the end (however slowly) of greyhound racing in america.

In Florida’s most recent attempt to restructure the state’s gaming laws, one proposal to decouple casino gambling from greyhound racing was rejected, though it may come year that is back next. Likewise, West Virginia killed a bill that would have cut the certification fees and reduced the minimal amount of race days needed at certainly one of hawaii’s two dog racing tracks.

With both owners and opponents up to speed for decoupling, you might be wondering who’s against the change. One answer is the horse racing industry, which believes such a movement could eventually kill their sport as well.

Horse racing is just a much more popular and financially viable sport than greyhound race. However, only the largest tracks are truly lucrative, and numerous now run ‘racinos’ with slot machines as well as other games in order to turn a profit. If horse racing weren’t needed, some of the tracks could switch up to casino that is pure, shrinking the industry.

Greyhound racing is currently illegal in 39 states, while four others have no tracks, despite having less laws and regulations prohibiting them. Each host one or two dog racing tracks along with Florida, which has a dozen venues, Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Iowa, Texas and West Virginia.

As Portuguese Economy Tumbles, RGA Chides Online Tax Hikes

The Remote Gambling Association has reacted to new Portuguese online sports betting operator taxes, even as Portugual continues to face crisis that is economic. (Image:

Even as Portuguese banking shares tumbled this week, sending fear throughout the EU bank system, the Remote Gambling Association (RGA), the largest online gaming trade association in the world, has slammed Portugal’s draft gambling bill, branding its tax prices as ‘unworkable’ and urged regulators to imagine once again. The punitive 8 to 16 % tax on recreations betting stakes would make the market ‘unviable’ for online operators, it states.

The bill is currently winging its way through the Portuguese parliamentary system, with the us government anxious to regulate at the earliest opportunity as section of a wide-ranging recovery plan that is economic. Portugal once was bailed out of a financial meltdown in 2011 by the EU Commission, the European Central Bank and Global Monetary Fund in a €78 billion ($106.14 billion) rescue system. It exited the program in May and now faces increasing pressure to bolster its still-embattled economy.

Secretary of State Adolfo Mesquita Nunes announced recently that tax profits from the online that is new gambling will be split between central and regional governments and used to ‘encourage sport as well as for cultural development.’ As well as the tax on stakes, gross revenue on sports gambling will be taxed at around 37.5 per cent, while ‘games of chance,’ which include casino gaming, and, apparently, poker, will be somewhere between the 15 to 30 percent mark.

‘To the Detriment of users and State’

The RGA claims that current taxation levels will restrict competition in the market ‘to the detriment of Portuguese consumers plus the income tax revenues that the Portuguese state could take were industry become taxed at a sensible rate of gross gaming revenue.’ In addition criticized the very fact that the Portuguese monopoly operator of offline sports wagering, Santa Casa, will likely be only taxed at half the rate of its counterparts that are online.

Clive Hawkswood, chief executive officer of the RGA, said: ‘Whilst the RGA and its particular people welcome the Portuguese initiative in seeking to regulate the web gambling sector, our users are extremely worried about the unworkable tax rates that are proposed in the draft legislation that will be presently being considered.

‘The extent of the disparity in income tax burden between licensed online sports betting operators while the offline monopoly operator Santa Casa might be just as much as 50 % and only Santa Casa. This kind of differential gets the potential to create a predicament of substantial illegal state aid being granted to Santa Casa by the Portuguese government whilst also destroying any hope for fair competition in the next regulated online sports betting government.’

Constructive Dialogue Needed

The current draft gambling bill recommends a jurisdiction similar to those that exist in countries like France and Italy while some lawmakers in Portugal wanted to see the introduction of an open market. Foreign operators are going to be able make an application for licenses supplying they ‘meet the requirements,’ and ‘are in good financial standing in their funds and social security.’ Nonetheless, companies will also need to be ‘established and registered’ within the united states and certainly will have to offer their services by way of a domain name that is bot.PT.

Mesquita Nunes refused to be drawn recently on any projections of annual revenue for the market that is new saying that it is impossible to know how numerous operators would apply for Portuguese licenses. The reply to that would be ‘not many. with the current proposed taxation figures, argues the RGA’

The RGA says it would welcome the opportunity to engage in a ‘constructive discussion because of the Portuguese government to ensure a playing that is level for several online sports betting operators seeking to obtain licenses.’

Leave a Reply