Resigned MLB star Jose Canseco lost a finger (again) during a poker competition week that is last.
Jose Canseco was the figure that is central a weekend for the poker world which was filled with fingers: some missing, some pointed at prominent names into the poker community. In Canseco’s case, he seemingly have lost the same little finger for the second time in about a month, something that few individuals (with any luck) will ever get to experience.
In belated October, Canseco ended up being in the news for inadvertently shooting himself in the hand. In accordance with Canseco, the incident happened while he was cleaning their gun in his kitchen. He ended up shooting their finger, which then needed to be surgically reattached. It appears some surgeons are more skilled than others at digital fixes, however.
Finger Comes Off During Poker Tournament
According to a tweet sent out by Canseco on Friday, but, the little finger became detached once more while he was playing in a poker tournament Thursday evening.
‘ I was playing in a poker competition last night and my little finger dropped of,’ Canseco tweeted. ‘Someone took a video of it.’
Fortunately, Canseco didn’t post that video, though there clearly was at least one expected image of his finger before it fell off. As gruesome while the incident may sound, however, Canseco said that this result may have been inescapable from the time he shot himself.
‘My little finger needs been amputated from the beginning,’ Canseco tweeted. ‘It was really loose with no bone to get in touch it. It ended up being also smelling really bad.’
There was no word on whether or not Canseco won the hand to create up for losing the hand. Previously, Canseco’s fingers were best-known for gripping bats during his 17-year major league career being a expert baseball player, during which he hit 462 home runs.
Colman Provides Hellmuth the Verbal Finger
Meanwhile, One Drop winner Daniel Colman was pointing a finger, still firmly connected, of their own at 13-time global World Series of Poker bracelet champion Phil Hellmuth. Colman made some harsh comments about Hellmuth in a thread about the latter’s current look on a podcast hosted by Rounders writer Brian Koppelman.
‘Its embarrassing that individuals have to share whores like this guy to our profession,’ Colman wrote. ‘After we win one drop, he immediately comes on stage to shake my turn in front of a camera and congratulate me personally. As though he’s the gatekeeper towards the poker world and welcoming me inside.
‘It is truly pathetic that a 40 old would behave the way he does at the table, not to mention how spineless he is, just willing to take any sponsorship regardless of the company’s integrity,’ the $22 million winner waxed on year. ‘ Really makes me sad to think there’s a chance some social people may look as much as this charlatan. Individuals of their mindset and character certainly are a cancer to this globe.’
Hellmuth was evidently hurt and surprised by the remarks, and responded briefly to them on Twitter.
‘Ouch, we was simply attacked time that is big a terrific poker forum,’ Hellmuth tweeted. ‘It was personal plus it hurts, but I am proud regarding the man I am!’
For his component, Colman later admitted that his choice of language was a bit too harsh, and made a decision to back the tone off of his post, even if he stood behind the message.
‘I acknowledge to being too harsh in my initial post. Phil didn’t deserve that hateful of the message,’ Colman later wrote. ‘That being said, we still stand by the main gist of my post. Phil’s behavior in poker is atrocious, and I do not think it belongs in this game.’
NBA Commissioner Adam Silver Pushing for Legal US Sports Betting
NBA Commissioner Adam Silver says that US sports that are legal ought to be regulated in the us. (Image: USATSI)
Can legal US sports betting, across the board, ever be a thing? a proponent that is surprising emerged in the form of NBA Commissioner Adam Silver.
Commissioner Silver penned an op-ed for The New York Times recently, stating that he believes it is time to allow sports gambling to legally take place throughout the United States. That stance is in opposition compared to that of all major sports organizations in the USA, including the previously held position by the NBA and its commissioner that is former Stern.
‘Betting on professional activities is illegal in the majority of the United States outside of Nevada,’ Silver said at the start of their viewpoint piece. ‘I believe we need a different approach.’
Currently Prohibited in Most States
Silver went on to describe the state that is current of betting in the united states.
In 1992, Congress passed the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act (PASPA), a piece of legislation that prohibited states from regulating sports betting, while grandfathering in four states that currently had some form of the betting available. Nevada could be the only state with complete activities betting, while Delaware, Montana and Oregon have the proper to offer more restricted forms of sports-based gambling.
The NBA, along with other sports leagues and organizations in the US, has previously stood in opposition to legalizing sports betting for decades as silver states. But who hasn’t stopped individuals from gambling on the games, regardless of the lack of the appropriate, regulated choice.
‘But despite legal restrictions, sports betting is extensive,’ Silver wrote. ‘It is a thriving underground company that runs clear of regulation or oversight. Because there are few legal options available, those who wish to bet resort to bookmaking that is illicit and shady overseas sites.’
Based on Silver, some estimates place the volume of illegal activities gambling within the united states of america at the maximum amount of as $400 billion per 12 months. That dwarfs the total amount of appropriate activities betting that happens in nevada casinos and other locations in Nevada.
Trends Aim Towards Regulation
In the piece, Silver writes in regards to the ‘domestic and trends that are global towards regulation of activities betting. He points out that many states now offer at least some kind of legal gambling, and that online gambling has already been managed in three states. Because of this, he says, it’s the perfect time for Congress to enact brand new laws to replace PASPA.
‘Congress should adopt a federal framework that allows states to authorize betting on professional sports, topic to strict regulatory needs and technical safeguards,’ he wrote.
Silver has previously made feedback suggesting he would be enthusiastic about seeing regulated sports wagering in the usa, though here is the first-time he has organized his place in full. Other sports leagues declined to discuss Silver’s stance.
Cuban Backs Silver’s Stance
Nonetheless, at least one NBA owner has already sided with the commissioner. Outspoken Dallas Mavericks owner Mark Cuban told CBSsports.com that ‘Adam has it exactly right.’
‘In the past for PR reasons, we have set up token resistance to them,’ Cuban said. ‘I agree with Adam that now is the time to take sports betting from the shadows and deal it is. with it like the huge business’
Despite Silver’s commentary, however, New Jersey shouldn’t expect the NBA to grab of the lawsuit that is aiming to stop the continuing state from allowing activities betting to continue at its gambling enterprises and racetracks.
‘Without a comprehensive solution that is federal state measures such as for instance brand New Jersey’s recent effort is going to be both unlawful and bad general public policy,’ Silver wrote.
Ron Paul Rails Against Adelson Online Poker Ban Plan
Ron Paul laid out their arguments against an online gambling ban that happens to be highly supported by casino magnate Sheldon Adelson. (Image: David J. Phillip /AP)
Ron Paul has used his column that is weekly for Ron Paul Institute to argue against an Internet gambling ban, saying that such legislation would curtail the freedom of People in america and is taken up only for the main benefit of casino owner Sheldon Adelson.
The previous Republican Representative from Texas called such legislation an example of ‘cronyism,’ one thing he claims that many Americans are against irrespective of their political ideologies.
‘For example, Congress may soon vote on legislation outlawing Internet gambling,’ Paul had written.
‘It is a secret that is open at least in the Beltway, that this legislation is being thought to be a favor to billionaire casino owner, Sheldon Adelson. Mr. Adelson, whom could very well be most widely known for making use of their enormous wealth to advance a pro-war international policy, is now making use of his governmental impact to turn his online competitors into crooks.’
Gambling Ban Introduced to Congress in March
Paul’s words refer to the Restoration of America’s Wire Act (RAWA), a bill that was introduced by Republicans in both houses of Congress in March, and it has since chosen up small but notable quantities of bipartisan support in both the House of Representatives and the Senate. The bill would outlaw most forms of online gambling during the federal degree, essentially changing the wording of the Wire Act to explicitly ban casino games and poker rather than just recreations betting, since it is slotsforfun-ca.com currently interpreted.
Paul spent much of his column dissecting and rejecting the reasons that are various for supporting the ban in an effort to show it was really just being considered for the sake of Adelson.
‘Supporters of an Internet gambling ban publicly deny they are motivated by a desire to curry favor with a rich donor,’ Paul wrote. ‘ Instead, they give a wide range of high-minded reasons for wanting to ban this activity. Some declare that legalizing online gambling will enrich criminals as well as terrorists! But criminalizing online gambling enterprises will not eradicate the need for online gambling enterprises. Alternatively, passage of this legislation will guarantee that the likely online gambling marketplace is controlled by crooks.’
Paul Criticizes States’ Rights Argument
Certainly one of the( that is major to numerous, perplexing) arguments employed by supporters of RAWA is that such a ban would actually protect states’ rights. Paul explained their argument before laying away his thinking for why it was faulty.
‘Their argument is the fact that citizens of states that ban Internet gambling may easily get around those rules by accessing online casinos operating in states where online gambling is legalized,’ Paul claimed. ‘ Whether or not the argument had merit that enabling states to legalize online gambling undermines laws in other states, it would not justify legislation that is federal the issue…arguing that ‘states liberties’ justifies creating new federal crimes turns the Tenth Amendment, which had been intended to limit federal power, on its mind.’
Paul laid out several more arguments against the legislation before summarizing his opposition to an online gambling ban.
‘The proposed ban on Internet gambling is a blatantly unconstitutional infringement on our liberties which will probably expand the surveillance state,’ he concluded. ‘Worst of all of the, it is all being done for the benefit of one effective billionaire.’
RAWA is unlikely to get a hearing or see much movement in Congress throughout the current lame duck session. However, its prospects could improve within the Congress that is next Republicans will have majorities in both the House and Senate.