Ah, sweet victory: Steve Wynn’s Everett, Massachusetts casino can finally move ahead following a referendum vote supporting casinos passed away night that is last.
Residents of Massachusetts have opted for to uphold the state’s three-year-old casino law, voting overwhelmingly in yesterday’s midterms in favor of maintaining the fledgling casino market, as the polls had predicted.
Somewhat confusingly, ‘no’ meant ‘yes’ for casinos on this ballot, as voters were asked or perhaps a legislation should really be repealed, with 59.5 per cent to 40.5 percent deciding that no, it should never be repealed, meaning that yes, they desired casinos.
Some commentators have recommended that the language used in posing the relevant question was deliberately muddled and created to confuse.
Nonetheless, it is a victory for MGM and Wynn Resorts, who have had their respective projects offered the greenlight by regulators and who can now finally and definitely go forward with the certification process, a privilege for which they will fork out $85 million an item before a single cornerstone is set.
Not surprisingly, casino executives had been jubilant and anxious to emphasize just what the casinos will do for their communities that are future.
‘Voters across the Commonwealth of Massachusetts today voiced their support of the 10,000 permanent job opportunities and significant economic benefits supplied by the Gaming Act of 2011,’ said pleased MGM Chairman and CEO Jim Murren. ‘MGM Resorts International would like to thank the thousands of volunteers and supporters who comprehended exactly what is at stake and worked so hard to bring this historic opportunity to realization for themselves and their neighbors … we are now able to begin the job of rebuilding a great downtown, and igniting a renaissance in Western Massachusetts.’
The Following Big Step
MGM now plans to build an $800 million casino resort on a 14.5-acre plot in downtown Springfield, with construction most likely to begin into the spring and a scheduled opening in summer time of 2017.
Wynn Resorts, meanwhile, which fought a protracted bidding war with Mohegan Sun for the best to make an application for the sole eastern Massachusetts license, the right it absolutely was granted just in early September, will get ahead with its plans to construct a $1.6 billion casino for a contaminated former chemical plant in Everett, north of Boston. Wynn will pay millions to own the site cleaned up and decontaminated before construction ensues.
‘it,’ said Wynn Resorts Senior Vice President Robert DeSalvio while it has been a long process, the benefits to everyone in the Commonwealth will be worth.
Never ever in Doubt?
The third license was secured early in the day in the year by Penn National Gaming, which quickly moved ahead having its plans to expand Plainridge Park harness racetrack into a slots parlor, despite knowing there is a chance that the bill might be repealed.
‘It’s a risk, however it’s a risk that is calculated’ said Jay Snowden, Penn National’s chief operating officer, several months right back. ‘We’re confident we’ll prevail in november’
And he had been right, but the presssing issue had been perhaps never truly in doubt. While the Repeal the Deal contingent was vocal, it lacked the funding of its powerful opponents, and the vote that is pro-casino led regularly in the polls.
According to campaign that is recent reports, ‘no’ (meaning yes) vote campaigners had raised nearly $12 million, most of it donated by casino organizations, while the ‘yes’ meaning no vote was able to raise just $675,000.
MGM donated $2.5 million and Wynn Resorts $1 million, while Penn National topped the bill with $3.2 million. This ended up being the reason that the effort that is pro-casino able to spend $2 million on casino marketing in October alone, at a period whenever its opponents were a declaring a balance of $30,000 and debts of $400,000.
Nationwide Election Results May Affect US Online Gambling
Supporters of a Wynn casino in Everett celebrated the defeat of the casino repeal effort in Massachusetts. (Image: Barry Chin/Globe Staff)
Election Day 2014 did not feature a referendum on Internet gambling, nor did anything earth-shattering occur that will forever change the gaming landscape in the United States.
Still, there were a true number of neighborhood results that were https://slotsforfun-ca.com/quick-hits-slot-review/ of interest to those who worry about gambling issues, and one overarching storyline that may contour the motion for the debate over online gambling for the next two years.
That big story, while you might have guessed, was the Republican takeover of the Senate.
While benefits (including a runoff election and a decision by Independent Senator Angus King on which party to caucus with) will not be known for some time, the GOP has clinched at the very least 52 seats in the Senate, one more than ended up being needed in order to take the majority.
Republican Majority and On Line Poker
While this shouldn’t incite panic among those whom enjoy online gambling, the Republican majorities in both houses are worth keeping track of. Thanks to a plank in the national Republican platform and the support of vegas Sands Chairman and CEO Sheldon Adelson, the absolute most vocal voices opposed to online gambling tend to come from the GOP. The majority that is new lead supporters of the Restoration of America’s Wire Act to try to advance the bill in Congress.
However, the likelihood of such a bill passing are still rather slim. Not everyone in the Republican Party is in favor of an online gambling ban, as well as a lot of those that are may not think the problem is well worth fighting over, as it’s hardly a major consideration one of the public that is general. While those in support of a ban might be able to court sufficient Democratic help to offset the losses inside their own party, that is far from specific, and the prospect of a split within the GOP regarding the issue could be enough to cease it from ever gaining any momentum.
Massachusetts Casino Repeal Defeated Handily
Much more results that are local there have been two ballot initiatives of interest to the gaming industry, one on each coast. On the East Coast, perhaps the gambling that is highest-profile of the year happened in Massachusetts, where anti-casino activists were hoping to repeal a law that allowed for the certification and building of three resort gambling enterprises in hawaii, along side a slots parlor. As recent polling suggested, the anti-casino forces came up well short, with 59 percent voting ‘No’ on the repeal.
Still, state officials acknowledged that the portion that is significant of population that had been against their efforts had made their sounds heard.
‘ We realize that approximately 41 percent voted in favor of the ballot initiative [meaning for the repeal], and it is our job to continue to earn the confidence of all the social people in Massachusetts proponents and opponents alike,’ said Steve Crosby, chairman of the Massachusetts Gaming Commission.
Meanwhile, voters in California rejected Proposition 48, a measure that could have allowed the North Fork Rancheria Band of Mono Indians to construct a casino that is major 40 kilometers far from their reservation. Had the proposition passed, opponents stated it would have set a precedent allowing tribes to build video gaming facilities far beyond their lands.
‘This vote no puts the ball squarely in the state Legislature’s court: they now can make a constant policy on tribal gaming,’ stated Cheryl Schmit, director of operate for California, an organization opposing the proposition.
Some gubernatorial events may also provide an impact on the future of both land-based and gambling that is online various states. Perhaps many notably, the re-election of Florida governor Rick Scott in a race that is tight Democratic challenger Charlie Crist was viewed as a bad sign for on the web gambling into the state, as Scott is a huge supporter of Adelson’s efforts to ban online gambling.
Chukchansi Gold Casino Tribal Leaders Turn Themselves In After Break-In
Tex McDonald, leader of the group that stormed the Chukchansi casino final thirty days, turns himself in. (Image: fresnobee.com)
Two council that is tribal faced with serious offenses relating to last month’s armed standoff during the Chukchansi Gold Resort and Casino near Coarsegold, California have turned themselves in. The casino was stormed by 20 armed men on October 9, the culmination of the bizarre power struggle between rival factions vying for control of the casino.
No arrests were made at the scene, since the siege occurred on tribal land, but Madera County District Attorney Michael Keitz announced last Friday that 15 of the aggressors would be faced with serious felonies, including kidnapping, false imprisonment, attack with a firearm, attack with a life-threatening weapon, and battery inflicting injury that is serious.
The team’s leader, Tex McDonald, 64, and fellow council member Vernon James King, 59, switched on their own in on Monday, accompanied several hours later by two members associated with the security force that accompanied the group in the raid.
McDonald, who has past beliefs for assault having a deadly weapon and making criminal threats, is charged with kidnapping, false imprisonment, attack having a firearm, attack with a lethal weapon, battery causing serious injury, and assault with a stun gun, and his bail has been set at $1 million. The other people face similar charges, with bail set at $800,000 for each.
Another security guard was arrested Sunday, but during the time of writing, 10 people remain at large.
The origin of the dispute among the Picayune Ranchera of Chukchansi Indians seems to relate to the practice that is controversial of,’ in which a tribe strips certain members of their tribal status, hence doubting them the associated advantages, in this instance benefit from the casino.
Since 2003, hundreds of members have now been stripped of their affiliations that are tribal including a number of the last native speakers of the Chukchansi language. This led to a disputed election in 2012 and a schism within the tribe between those who supported disenrollment and those bitterly opposed.
This indicates the McDonald faction had been managing the casino from its base at a nearby business complex up until August, if the rival faction, led by Reggie Lewis, a proponent of disenrollment and incumbent frontrunner of the council after the disputed election, occupied the 10th and 11th floors associated with the casino within the very early hours of the early morning, effortlessly taking it over.
Then in October, the Tribal Gaming Authority threatened to close the casino down and fine the tribe as much as $16 million, because of late filing of audits. This prompted the McDonald faction to work, in whatever they claim was an attempt to retrieve the audits and save the casino.
Criminal or Hero?
And to some, despite the criminality of his tactics, McDonald is a hero, a ‘patriot’ fighting for the great of this tribe. ‘My clients went in to recover documents therefore the casino wouldn’t power down,’ claimed his lawyer, adding that the faction represented the ‘duly constituted council that is tribal. They simply took steps to protect the tribe.’
Others, however, don’t see quite the same heroic techniques in the break-in.
‘Calling Tex McDonald a patriot is like calling a dictator democratically elected,’ said Richard Verri, representing the Lewis group. ‘ The justice that is criminal will see whether or not the images caught on video associated with the illegal actions while the violence he committed upon a casino employee ended up being lawful or criminal.’
Regardless of the truth for the matter, McDonald now faces a ‘significant amount of time’ in state prison, according to District Attorney Keitz. And meanwhile the casino remains shuttered by order of the federal judge, with the consequence of lost revenue becoming devastating to the community.